Taxis and Pollution in Mexico City
Contributed by Bernardo Navarro Benítez
Francisco Guardado and Ed Dunlea in hot
pursuit to
measure exhaust emissions from taxi during the
MCMA-2003 campaign. |
Taxis and the City
Within the public transportation in the Federal District (DF),
taxis have the largest fleet, adding between 103,000 to 106,000
formally registered units, besides the unregistered ones, popularly
known as “pirates.” Hence, the taxi fleet is three times
higher to that of ‘colectivos’ (minibuses) –see
Table 1– although colectivos make 58% of the total trips in
the city and taxis only 4.4% of them. The number of registered taxis
per habitant is larger than that of cities like Madrid, Paris and
even Sao Paulo and New York City. In order to add up the total number
of taxis in the city, we must add 6,109 units of the neighboring
municipalities of the State of Mexico, besides the considerable
number of “pirates” in these municipalities. Of the
total ‘registered’ metropolitan fleet, 56% is made out
of models 1992 and earlier, meaning that they do not have any anti-pollutant
systems and are thought to contribute about 158,000 tons of pollutants
annually. 1 It is estimated that in the
DF close to 90% of the vehicles ride under the modality of “free
taxis” and only the other 10% belongs to one of the more organized
modalities: Radio Taxi, Stand Taxi or Tourist Taxi.
Characteristics of the fleet and service
Taxis are very important not only for the public service they
provide to the occasional and habitual users, but also for the employment
and income source they represent for a large sector of the city’s
society. It is calculated that around half a million Mexicans depend
on this activity. But also, the vehicles used for this service are
important consumers of fossil fuels and, due to the age of its fleet
and to the particular operational an organizational conditions,
have an important impact on the environment of the metropolis, as
they represent only 2.9% of the metropolitan fleet, but contribute
with 13.3% of the main air pollutant emissions generated from the
passenger transportation fleet. It is beyond doubt that the taxi
sector needs an urgent modernization in various aspects for the
benefit of the environment, as well as that of the taxi-operator,
the concessionaries, its organizations and the people in general.
Presently, there are 324 taxi organizations in the DF. From this
total, 94% (305) have adopted the form of Civil Association (Asociación
Civil), and the other 6% (19) have turned into an organization under
the form of a Mercantile Association (Sociedad Mercantil).
As Table 2, the evolution of the taxi vehicle fleet has been vertiginous
between 1988 and 2000, growing more than double in only 12 years,
a period in which the DF slowed down its demographic growth rate
and even expelled population from its territory. This is why we
underlined above that taxis, besides being a strategic service,
has also represented an opportunity for self employment, particularly
during the years of “economic adjustment” when hundreds
of thousands of jobs were eliminated in the formal sector.
What about the “pirates”?
One of the biggest questions in the sector is the large number
of “pirate” units in this activity. As part of the UAM-
MIT project, we were able to make an approximation through a counting
method of the number of “pirate” taxis circulating in
the DF: in a period of one week, we made 30 surveillance between
2:00 and 7:00 pm at a fixed crossroad in the city, counting 1500
taxis.
Out of this total, 224 units did not have the attributes that
could certify them as regulars, and 1276 were registered as legal.
This means that practically 15% of the units were irregular (14.9%),
which, if extrapolated to the total number of taxis in the DF would
represent the existence of 15,000 irregular vehicles. However, the
total number of irregular taxis might be a bit larger, around 18,000,
as they are generally located around the bus terminals and in the
border with the neighboring municipalities. However, because of
the same nature of the service they provide, taxis end up running
through the main roads of the city.
A larger concentration of irregular taxis was observed during
the evening in the counting exercise, at which the percentage of
irregular taxis fluctuated between 22 and 24%.
Taxis and the environment
The contribution of pollutants from taxis is, in order of importance,
the third within the transportation of people, and fourth if we
include cargo transportation. As shown in Table 3, for the year
2001, taxis contributed 8.82% of pollutants included, but represent
only 4.4% of the total number of trips in the MCMA. Also, the negative
impact of used tires and oils on water and soil should be added,
as a large percentage of the fleet gets their maintenance not in
shops but in public roads.
The disproportionate impact of taxis is related mostly to the
age of its fleet, oversupply of service, and its particular forms
of exploitation.
Public actions for improving the taxi service
Probably due to the described characteristics, a number of public
policies to improve taxi service had been decided by December 2000,
trying, at the same time, to improve its environmental impacts.
Among the actions that stand out, we find:
- Suspension of new concessions
- Substitution of obsolete vehicles with new cars equipped catalytic
converter and four doors
- Establishment of more taxi stands in order to minimize roaming
without passengers
- Campaigns against pirates Table 1 . Daily Trips and Vehicle
Fleet of Public Transportation in the DF. ( Source: Secretaría
de Transporte y Vialidad, GDF, 1999.)
- Trolley bus and light train.
Table 2 . Evolution of Fleet of Free and Stand
Taxi Service in DF.
%TCRFTP: Porcentaje total con respecto a la flota total de pasajeros.
1) FTTP: Flota total transporte concesionado de pasajeros: Sedán,
Combi y Minibús.
Table 3 . Means of Transportation and Pollutant
Contributions to the Environment in MCMA.
These important policies have had important advances but have
also found severe limitations that are inherent to the characteristics
of the sector.
This way, for example, the suspension of new concessions has been
limited with the “pirates,” as well as by the management
of the concessions by powerful groups and corruption. The vehicle
substitution faces the challenge of credit accessibility needed
to buy new cars and the oversupply of the taxi service. As for the
campaigns against the “pirates,” these have to fight
corporatism, judicial gaps and ambiguities, as well as corruption.
Conclusions
- The current exploitation rate and obsolescence of the vehicular
fleet of the taxi service provokes important environmental impacts
illustrated above. To reinforce the renovation of the vehicles
and impulse the reorganization of the exploitation in relation
to the coherent implementation of the above mentioned measures
will have a direct benefit on the improvement of air quality,
as well as the service to benefit the users and the people in
general.
- Taxi service has a metropolitan dimension, for which the design
of policies must involve close collaboration among the various
authorities involved with problems of agglomeration, Governments
of the State of Mexico, DF and Federal, overall those related
to its environmental impact, as well as with its representations,
and local and federal congress.
Table 1.
Daily Trips and Vehicle Fleet of Public Transportation in
the DF.
TRANSPORT
|
TRIPS
PERSON / DAY
|
UNITS
(% OF FLEET)
|
Metro
|
4,278,243
(18%)
|
(2.0%)
|
Electric
vehicles*
|
262,909
(01%)
|
(0.3%)
|
Buses
|
573,619
(02%)
|
(0.8%)
|
Microbuses
& Combis
|
17,495,385
(73%)
|
(22.2%)
|
Taxis
|
1,314,544
(06%)
|
(74.7%)
|
TOTAL
|
23,924,700
(100%)
|
119,943
( 100.0%)
|
Source: Secretaría de Transporte
y Vialidad, GDF,1999.
* Trolley bus and light train.
Table
2. Evolution of Fleet of Free and Stand Taxi Service
in DF.
Year
|
1988
|
1989
|
1990
|
1991
|
1992
|
1993
|
1994
|
1995
|
1996
|
1997
|
1998
|
1999
|
2000
|
Taxis
|
51,906
|
51,906
|
55,717
|
59,051
|
59,211
|
56,180
|
63,935
|
80,869
|
82,770
85,437*
|
87,499
|
93,332
|
97,455
|
104,418
|
F.T.T.P.1)
|
93,941
|
93,941
|
98,282
|
101,173
|
101,707
|
109,719
|
109,931
|
155,927
|
111,700*
|
_
|
_
|
_
|
_
|
%T.C.R.F.T.P.+
|
55.25
|
55.25
|
56.69
|
58.36
|
58.21
|
51.20
|
58.15
|
51.86
|
76.48
|
|
|
|
|
Free
taxis
%+
|
27,017
52.05
|
27,675
53.31
|
30,742
37.22
|
33,947
57.48
|
34,034
57.47
|
32,851
58.47
|
36,859
57.65
|
60,935
75.35
|
75,733*
88.64
|
78,778
90.03
|
84,086
90.09
|
87,881
90.17
|
92,139
|
Stand
taxis
%+
|
24,889
47.95
|
24,231
46.69
|
24,973
62.78
|
25,104
42.52
|
25,177
42.53
|
23,329
41.53
|
27,076
42.35
|
19,934
24.63
|
9,704*
11.36
|
8,721
9.97
|
9,246
9.91
|
9,574
9.83
|
9,971
|
Stands
|
154
|
154
|
154
|
154
|
165
|
165
|
165
|
_
|
_
|
_
|
_
|
_
|
_
|
%TCRFTP: Porcentaje total con respecto
a la flota total de pasajeros.
1) FTTP: Flota total transporte concesionado de pasajeros: Sedán,
Combi y Minibús.
Table 3. Means of Transportation
and Pollutant Contributions to the Environment in MCMA.
Source/pollutants
|
PM10
ton
|
%
|
SO2
ton
|
%
|
CO
ton
|
%
|
NOx
ton
|
%
|
HC
ton
|
%
|
Total/ton
|
%
|
Private
autos
|
701
|
10.31
|
2,000
|
48.67
|
822,477
|
55.66
|
47,380
|
32.36
|
81,705
|
50.19
|
|
53.08
|
Taxis
|
199
|
2.93
|
567
|
13.80
|
131,453
|
8.90
|
11,093
|
7.58
|
15,310
|
9.40
|
158,622
|
8.82
|
Combis
|
10
|
0.15
|
28
|
0.68
|
20,448
|
1.38
|
930
|
0.64
|
1,945
|
1.19
|
23,361
|
1.30
|
Microbuses
|
59
|
0.87
|
166
|
4.04
|
216,740
|
14.67
|
9,524
|
6.50
|
19,761
|
12.14
|
246,250
|
13.70
|
Diesel
buses
|
1,174
|
17.26
|
214
|
5.21
|
9,270
|
0.63
|
11,640
|
7.95
|
3,853
|
2.37
|
26,151
|
1.45
|
Motorcycles
|
22
|
0.32
|
63
|
1.53
|
22,729
|
1.54
|
215
|
0.15
|
4,742
|
2.91
|
27,771
|
1.54
|
Diesel
trucks
|
1,990
|
29.26
|
363
|
8.83
|
16,675
|
1.13
|
22,678
|
15.49
|
7,587
|
4.66
|
49,293
|
2.74
|
Diesel
trucks
(> 3 t)
|
2,562
|
37.67
|
468
|
11.39
|
20,956
|
1.42
|
27,662
|
18.89
|
9,205
|
5.65
|
60,853
|
3.38
|
Trucks
(gas)
|
84
|
1.24
|
240
|
5.84
|
216,865
|
14.68
|
15,297
|
10.45
|
18,683
|
11.48
|
251,169
|
13.97
|
TOTAL
|
6,801
|
100.00
|
4,109
|
100.00
|
1,477,613
|
100.00
|
146,419
|
100.00
|
162,791
|
100.00
|
1,797,733
|
100.00
|
Bernardo Navarro Benítez is a
researcher at the Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana-Xochimilco.
This work is supported by the Integrated Program on Urban, Regional
and Global Air Pollution with funds from Comisión Ambiental
Metropolitana.
1 Gobiernos del Distrito
Federal, Estado de México y Federación. Programa para
el Mejoramiento de la Calidad del Aire de la ZMVM 2002-2010 . México,
2003, 8-20. |